Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Most of the decisions are based on experience and learning, we tried to correlate past events with the present to get the best result in any situation. The prompt suggests that knowledge of past events can not help us to make important decisions today. In my opinion, I do not agree with the recommendation because of the following reasons.
To begin with, humans always learn from experience and tried to avoid the mistake done in the past. Because as human beings we can not foresee the consequences of the action taken. However, we learned to make the decision based on the previous experience to eschew known error. For instance, during election time, people give their votes based on the performance of the political party in their last term. Consequently, if peoples feel that the current ruling party isn't meeting the people's demands then they may give their vote to other promising parties. Hence, most of the political campaign shows their previous years achievements to seek public attention. The public can not decide based on their present promises, because any party can make gigantic promises but few can fulfill it. The above example demonstrates that it is necessary to know about past performance and experience to decide the present vote. Thus, It's feasible to say that our knowledge about the previous experience helps us in deciding today's valuable decisions.
Furthermore, it's best to analyze the situation before making the important decisions, hence experience served as a perfect data set because it is the only known thing. When we do a critical analysis of the given scenario, we encounter the future shortcomings as well as already happened mistakes. Past left the major effects on anyone's mind, whether it's good or bad both remain in the mind of people. For example, one company wants to hire a person in the CEO position. It is a critical thing for any company to handover the business decision on one person's hand. Consequently, the company takes the interview of the applied candidate and sort the best-fit according to their response. At the same time, the company scrutinizes the past behavior and performance of the sorted candidate before assigning the post. Consequently, if any candidate excelled during the interview but was involved in corruption or any other conspiracy in his last company then he will get rejected. On the contrary, if the person showed extraordinary performance during his last years and has a good name in the market then he has more chances to get selected for the CEO post. The above example illustrates that knowing the past helps best in present to take the crucial decisions.
Some may argue that what happened in the past stayed in the past and have no effects on the present. For example, one company wants to expand its business in a new country. Consequently, the norms and ethics of the new market are different from the last market and the company can not adopt its past strategy in the new market. However, certain characteristics of the human remain the same at any place, which company can use in the new market. Hence, still, we can use several past experiences in the present decision-making process.
All things considering, we can say that in the decision-making process previous experience and knowledge play an important role. We can eliminate some of the negative outcomes using our experience.
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to avoid the mistake done in the past. Because as human beings we can not foresee the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ples feel that the current ruling party isnt meeting the peoples demands then they m...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ake the crucial decisions. Some may argue that what happened in the past stayed i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...arket. Hence, still, we can use several past experiences in the present decision-making process....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lay an important role. We can eliminate some of the negative outcomes using our experience....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2824.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00709219858 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76687109842 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460992907801 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2750294346 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3793103448 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4482758621 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86206896552 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238651474716 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064906087036 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816854010934 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143710826925 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580721481158 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.