School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
This topic raises the controversial issue that whether schools should also prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood. Once we enter the Professional world it not only tests us on our academic skills but our non academic skills as well, hence I totally disagree that schools should focus only on the academic part of an individual.
Our school subjects prepare us with the required academic skills to enter into the professional world. But non-academic skills such as communication skills, presentation skills are also equally important. A company looks for individual who is able to speak to customers, who is able to present a presentation confidently to the panel, who is aware of how to speak in a particular environment. At the end of the day howsoever great your content would be , you should be confident enough to convince others regarding the same. Many students especially introverts when they enter the professional environment find it difficult to open up with others.
Communications skills play an extremely important role in our day to day life. We speak to many people be it professional or personal. We have to take many decisions every single day. Some people might say that now-a-days the more academically stable you are in your domain the more you be successful. Let’s consider a digital marketing executive working for xyz company. He is well aware and thorough of his product but the catch is whether he will be able to convince the audience for the same. And that’s where our non-academic skills come to picture. If the executive had known how to convince people and how speak and present his product confidently then definitely he would be successful in his task.
In conclusion, our schools, the way they are preparing us academically to enter into the professional world. Similarly, should help us in gaining these non-academic skills which are essential for our adulthood. Since Schools lay up the foundation an individual’s growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Sakshi Jain | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Newmember_69 | 58 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Christiana Longe | 33 | view |
- School should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 percent less likely to be involved in a work related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave Researchers hypothesize 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ay howsoever great your content would be , you should be confident enough to convi...
^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it difficult to open up with others. Communications skills play an extremely ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which are essential for our adulthood. Since Schools lay up the foundation an indivi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14461538462 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00011918415 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4920171475 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241244398544 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764613830968 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751167235197 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159130122209 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324843595546 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.