Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I mostly believe that the opinion from other field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in science field, but it may not be the case in other domain, like education and disease prevention.
First of all, experts could make mistake. Even they are professors in education field, they could overlook the vital trend happening gradually. And that would lead to the failure of the policy. For example, Taiwan education department had widely established a lot of colleges and universities years ago in order to elevate the education degree of its people. However, the birth rate has decreased gradually and there are fewer and fewer young people to go to school. Today, some schools have been abandoned and abolished because they don't have enough students enrolling to support their finance. If someone could notice the declination of the birth rate, then he or she could prevent it from happening and save a lot of cost for building schools.
Secondly, there are few people outside science and math field making huge contribution. For instance, MENSA is a group consisting of high intelligent people and they are expected to make evident contribution to the science field. Nevertheless, little contribution, if any, has been achieved. In contrast, Einstein and Newton are notable scientists that evolve the knowledge in science field. They proposed Relativity Law and Classic Physic on which many technologies are based so far.
However, except science field, the leadership from a layperson is sometimes better than experts in the field. For instance, the leader of Taiwan CDC governor, Chen Shih-Chung has successfully attenuated the coronavirus spreading and the situation has been zero cases confirmed for many days so far. He had been a dentist before he was in charge of the leader of disease prevention. He is not even an expert in the disease spreading field. Therefore, besides the knowledge of a specific field, the judgement and capability of handling emergency problems matter more.
In conclusion, experts are much more likely to make crucial contribution in science field than a layperson, but everyone from one field could have invaluable achievement to another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 73
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 63
- In an effort to bring new jobs to Dillton and stimulate the city s flagging economy Dillton s city council voted last year to lower the city s corporate tax rate by 15 percent at the same time the city began offering generous relocation grants to any comp 59
- Question Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview It is time for the city of Grandview to stop funding the Grandview Symphony Orchestra It is true that the symphony struggled financially for many years but last year private 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...en abandoned and abolished because they dont have enough students enrolling to suppo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19382022472 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76881810166 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7144669897 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3157894737 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190951612233 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579313132117 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648996774303 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125416490988 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702034478773 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.