Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Nature and human beings are complementary of each other in many ways. But so many times humans take such actions which cause harm to plants and animal kingdom. A section of people opine that we have lost a lot of time to take any action for the betterment; however, others assert that it can be difficult but is not impossible to correct our mistakes. Both the sides of the arguments present the rational ideas of the topic which will be dilated in the following paragraphs, followed by my belief.
Beyond any qualms, there are several compelling reasons why ecological system is the utmost need of human beings. Primarily, food cycle of the nature has been disturbed dramatically as so many species are extinct now. For instance, a recent report published by UN environmental conservation department found that illegal hunting and poaching of wild animals and water animals have disturbed natural repairing system in the environment and the best example of this situation is unlimited hunting of whales in the South China sea by Japan and China. Hence, the need of the hour is to take strict steps and stop all of it in order to save animals.
On the contrary, there is a myriad of logical thoughts to support the view that better late than never. People cannot deny that we have destroyed natural environment to the highest and which is difficult to regain but still can save the rest and take precautions while engaging in any activity beforehand. To exemplify, a study released by Singapore government that urbanization has caused major harm to the water resources and non-renewable too and now they will not develop the area near the sea-shore to save sea-food. Thus, every country and its people need to take responsibility to save environment by controlling their harmful actions towards mother nature.
However, I second with the view that government has to take strong steps in order to maintain environmental laws. It has been noticed several times that there are laws in the country but are not in action on the ground level. That is to say, government should run awareness programs to sensitize people and the new generation to save the plants and plant more and more trees to upgrade the level of greenery. Simultaneously, inculcate the lessons in school curriculum to give an insight about how to contribute in surrounding in order to maintain environment. Thus, it will take years to get repair or regain but will definitely improve the present situation.
Although, nature has degraded too much but we cannot stay out of the loop and think bad. We as altogether have to be determined to correct mistakes of generations and decades. But will it be followed forever? Still stays a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2022-12-03 | trucvy112233 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Priyanksuthar | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ttha | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Cicihg | 89 | view |
- Crime among teenagers is increasing day by day What sorts of punishment would you suggest for these children 95
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Crime among teenagers is increasing day by day What sorts of punishment would you suggest for these children 11
- Task 1 Ques The map below shows a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 word 11
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... support the view that better late than never. People cannot deny that we have destro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, so, still, thus, while, as to, for instance, on the contrary, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9192139738 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7486308048 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7657427061 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8095238095 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16832485448 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430265354024 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293999959538 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860707051128 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248479187311 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.