A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for
practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
It is common that in many countries, students are not encouraged to follow a vocational training
course. While nobody can deny the need for university graduates, I totally agree that
governments should provide funding for more people to qualify as electricians, plumbers or
other essential manual workers.
It is essential to continue to allocate resources to university education. In the sciences, there is a
growing demand for researchers and professionals in fields such as genetics, medicine and
leading-edge technology. Only through university training can school-leavers acquire a good
grasp of specialised areas of knowledge. For example, the search for a vaccine to combat the
coronavirus outbreak shows the need for virologists, statisticians and other academically-
trained experts in related areas. In terms of the humanities, universities play a leading role in
the formation of those creative individuals who pursue a successful career in literature, drama,
the arts and even in the advertising industry.
However, I completely agree with the argument that countries should prioritise expenditure on
vocational skills training. Firstly, such workers are vital when, for instance, new buildings are
constructed or when existing buildings have to be renovated or simply maintained. Indeed, in
many countries, a permanent maintenance staff of skilled tradesmen is employed in hospitals,
schools or museums, ensuring the safety of all who use the buildings. Secondly, in some
developed countries, there is an existing imbalance in the economy, resulting in graduate
unemployment, while at the same time there is a shortage of skilled labour. Governments in
those countries need, therefore, to work with employers to ensure that extra vocational training
is provided.
In conclusion, vocational training must be high on the agenda of governments to avoid a
shortage of practical, skilled employees, while investment should continue in the universities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | chile | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | lehung | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | Trang Hạnh | 80 | view |
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for many people why is this a case Do you think it is a negative or positive situation 73
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so the medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do you think the disadvantages of private health care out weigh the advantages 79
- A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coronavirus
...e search for a vaccine to combat the coronavirus outbreak shows the need for virologists...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... universities play a leading role in the formation of those creative individuals...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85324232082 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29104754668 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597269624573 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4504225737 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261765635684 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866421154881 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576351983816 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626546208015 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526589273022 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.