The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:
“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”
The writer states in his article that illegal immigrants pose a threat to a nation's economy and national identity. He goes further to state that the numbers of illegal immigrants entering the country are not properly checked. However, before the argument can be properly evaluated, some specific evidence to substantiate the writer's assumptions must be provided.
First, the writer claims that there are no specific measures currently in place to check the number of illegal immigrants entering the country and efforts are not being made to return them to their country of origin. He fails to provide supportive evidence to bolster this claim. For example, the united states are actively putting measures in place to curb the issue of illegal immigration on its texas and San Diego borders. The department of immigration painstakingly conducts adequate measures - from carrying out background checks on individuals before issuing their visas and further singling out individuals before they are granted entry into the country - in checking the problem of illegal immigration. If the efforts being made by the country's immigration department are instrumental in curbing these measures, the writer's assumptions that these problems are not being checked is flawed.
Secondly, the writer further claims that illegal immigrants pose threats to a nation's economy and national identity but lacks adequate information to substantiate this claim. The "threats" referred to by the author is very vague as it could mean a number of things. For instance, the writer may be claiming that there has been an observed increase in crime rates and is subsequently attributing this increase to the presence of a more diverse nationality within that community. There may however be other reasons for the increase in crime rates - drop in police presence, economic changes. If evidence is provided as does not correlate with the writer's claim that the ilegal immigrants are responsible for the prevailing economic situation, the argument would be fla
In conclusion, the argument has it stands is fundamentally flawed as the writer fails to provide more insights into how illegal immigrants are solely to blame for a nation's dwindling economy. The writer can provide more information as to how the current measure put in place by the nation's immigration is insufficient in addressing this problem.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-11 | Kaira | 48 | view |
2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 78 | view |
2023-06-28 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
2023-04-01 | aiswaryae | 50 | view |
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 58
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 66
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 60
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 374 350
No. of Characters: 1976 1500
No. of Different Words: 173 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.398 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.283 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.794 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 164 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 135 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.827 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.36 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.555 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...t illegal immigrants pose a threat to a nations economy and national identity. He goes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...at illegal immigrants pose threats to a nations economy and national identity but lacks...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...egal immigrants are solely to blame for a nations dwindling economy. The writer can provi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...the current measure put in place by the nations immigration is insufficient in addressi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 374.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40374331551 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93543244587 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483957219251 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4827096518 57.8364921388 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.357142857 119.503703932 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258163442172 0.218282227539 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985054731196 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694348008688 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162157977109 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06635527618 0.0628817314937 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.3799401198 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.