The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial: "The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin"
The argument is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the argument is based on the unwarranted assumptions that the autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders, rendering its main conclusion that due approach should be enforced to return immigrants back to their country as they pose threats, invalid.
The argument fails to provide any justification that the autonomy of a country is a function of how secure its border is. Even if the argument provide information to show that progress of a country forthrightly relates to its borders between other contiguous countries, it is still not veritable as a pragmatic approach can still be executed to check for the reliability of this claim.
The argument also leaves many unanswered questions. Even if the econonmy and national identity of a country are in serious problem due to inability to check for the number of illegal immigrants, it is insufficient to accept that assertion. The argument could do something as simple yet as effective as consulting a town Librarian to review published studies to show whether a parallel exists between growing number of illegal immigrants and the economy situation and national identity of a such country. It could also hire an independent research firm to determine whether a correlation exists between bad economy and rash illegal immigrants.
Finally, the argument claims without warrant that illegal immigrants pose threats. Here again, research is a vital ally: What is the percentage contribution of illegal immigrants threast to the country economy and national identity problem compare to other factor that may cause them? How can economy problem could be reduced without reducing the number of illegal immigrants? Aswering such questions might help to clarify a solution to the country economy and national identity problem.
Because the argument makes several unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make a convincing case that the auntonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders hence illegal immigrants shou.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | Kaira | 48 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | aiswaryae | 50 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 55
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33538461538 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88525162214 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486153846154 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.2264956098 57.8364921388 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.384615385 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442538041852 0.218282227539 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150724770877 0.0743258471296 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822180511214 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247781708639 0.128457276422 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371947689285 0.0628817314937 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.3799401198 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.3550499002 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33538461538 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88525162214 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486153846154 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.2264956098 57.8364921388 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.384615385 119.503703932 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442538041852 0.218282227539 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150724770877 0.0743258471296 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822180511214 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247781708639 0.128457276422 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371947689285 0.0628817314937 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.3799401198 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.3550499002 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 98.500998004 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.