Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The contribution of charitable organizations to the wellbeing of citizens of developing countries is undeniable. Their help ranges from economic empowerment, education investment, and financial assistance. While many individuals are in the belief that charitable organizations should lend people a hand no matter where they are from, others debate that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is located. From my standpoint, I would agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, it is true that people in a country should help each other as much as possible. From a very long time ago, there was a Vietnamese legend about Lac Long Quan and Au Co who brought to the world a big pouch which got out one hundred eggs that gave birth to one hundred babies which is then believed to be the ancestors of Viet Nam’s community. It encourages/promotes the message that people of the same origin and nationality should love and help others if they could. If “humanitarian systems” only target the poor in their vicinity, they can comprehensively focus their resources, time and effort on those people. However, this point of view does not highlight the essence of chariting. That of chariting is the help to unlucky people from the bottom of one’s heart. If possible, the help should be spread all over the globe, since people of low living conditions can be found anywhere and there will never be enough charity for them.
On the other hand, many philanthropic organizations have the resources and influence to help people from other countries. Therefore, they should reach out to people in need of help in those countries. This altruistic action not only positively improves the two countries’ diplomatic relationship but also brings that organization a good reputation. Thus, more and more people keep an eye on it which offers that organization a great deal of propitious chances for fundraising. Nonetheless, the international transportations delivering resources to poor people in other countries could be costly. For charitable organizations, optimizing operational costs is the foremost priority.
In conclusion, both of these statements are partly right and partly wrong to a certain extent. Thus, I suppose that charitable organizations should put the interests of their country first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | drmona.914 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-23 | Amityy | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
- Throughout history people have dreamed perfect society but they have not agreed what an ideal society is What do you think the most important elements to have perfect society in modern world How people can achieve an ideal society 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 61
- Some educators believe that international school exchange visits are important for teenage children To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- In some cultures older people are valued most highly In other cultures youth is valued more than experience Discuss both views and give your opinion as to which age should be most valued 78
- The only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople of the same origin and nationality should love and help others if they coul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i suppose, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25737265416 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12099120069 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552278820375 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4826168118 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.210526316 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422168522653 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119747800908 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1241911734 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251512006568 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118671628961 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.