Do you prefer traditional style classes or pre-recorded classes?
It is often claimed that many teachers refer to the use of modern technology in the classroom. As for me, I support the idea of using traditional style lessons and here I will state two reasons why I am convinced that it is right.
Indeed, it is definitely important for the children to have a personal contact with a teacher as it improves the quality of comprehension of the subject material. If the students are sitting in a class listening the lecture, they can observe the teacher’s emotions, ask questions, learn discipline, and be involved in the lesson’s process. During the quarantine period, students had a lack of a personal contact with the teacher and it decreased their school knowledge. That is why I am persuaded that a real lecturer approach is better for the educational process and that it effectively improves the understanding of the subject.
By the same token, traditional style classes enhences student’s abilities of being accurate with details and listening to the lecturer attentively. Also, it trains the pupils to make notes in order to remember the new information and work with their written material later. If the students make notes while listening to the lecture, it improves their concentration and attention to details, it helps them to develop their brain, it allows to practice in remembering the information fast. So, real lessons positively effect the brain development of the students of different ages and enhance their creative thinking skills.
Nonetheless, the fast development of the educational technologies cannot be overestimated and it offers the professors more new opportunities. At the same time, it is easier and more affordable for schools to provide pre-recorded classes and share them with kids during the school semester. YouTube allows the teachers to use video lessons for many times with students and spend more time on creating the educational content. It is true that technological platforms also offer students an option to listen to the lection several times and not miss any detail.
To sum up, I would like to say that the pre-recorded lections will never remove the use of traditional lessons in the educational process. Real classes’ need in the educational system is crucial and the video lessons will never offer the people the options that the normal school approach will.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Thomas2028 | 76 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | Atharva_Bhide1808 | 70 | view |
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 90
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 84
- The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with a forecast for 2015 78
- he Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools Do you agree or disagree with this prediction 73
- The graph provides information about the number of people of both genders who continued their postgraduate studies on full time or part time basis from 1970 to 1991
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'practicing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: practicing
... them to develop their brain, it allows to practice in remembering the information fast. So...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, nonetheless, so, while, as for, it is true, to sum up, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16449086162 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95934545604 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506527415144 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4318175471 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.625 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13235411648 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452489829811 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646273387309 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076920005138 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343511490153 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.