Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both of these views and give your opinion.
There is an increase in the disappearance of several languages since some native speakers use common languages instead of their indigenous tongue. While some argue that allocating budget to preserve these tongues is wasteful, I assume that this could be an effective way to protect language diversity.
On the one hand, some object to expense funding on language preservation. First, facilities such as infrastructure or the healthcare system play important roles in the growth of the country. Therefore, the government should provide proper funding in these priorities. Specifically, the advanced transport system will eliminate the economic disparities between domestic regions and attract investment from powerful countries. Moreover, with the raising of the aging workforce and brain drain, the authority should spend money on attracting young talents to serve the country rather than protect languages that seem unpopular and useless in daily life.
Nevertheless, I believe that the government should give financial support to prevent aboriginal languages from dying out. To begin with, a language is much more than simply a means of communication, it is the conduit of human heritage. To be extended, it represents culture as well as holds knowledge amassed for millennia. Therefore, by revitalizing these tongues, we could not only unearth the unknown history but also maintain the culture and wisdom of the nation as well. In other words, when a language dies so does the link to the cultural and historical past. Without a crucial connection to their linguistic and cultural history, people lose their sense of identity and belonging.
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow indigenous tongues to vanish, but in the long term, this would have an extremely negative impact on the human heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Hanabi | 56 | view |
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 78
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both of 84
- Many high level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women To what extent do you a 73
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38675958188 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89420594034 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641114982578 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.346285276 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251056757991 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716899166389 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463245821351 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12858303396 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366306755555 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.