The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
The diagrams illustrate how the layout of a small theater changed over a period of 2 years, from 2010 to 2012.
Generally, significant changes have been made in terms of the size of stage and the theater’s interior design, especially on the south side of the theater.
As can be seen from the maps, the storage in the left side of stage was moved to the right one and substituted by media room with showers inside. The old media place was narrowed to give way to a huge stage and was replaced by the hall.
While the auditorium and main entrance remained in the same place after 2 years, the space for foyer was expanded to the left and rearranged the locations of interior offices. The admin office and ticket office in the left corner were removed to the northwest corner and southeast corner, respectively. The space for them was used for restaurants.
- The graph below shows the percentage of female students on four different course at one university from 1970 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 61
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 709.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6339869281 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51431036059 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0991831688 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15083680513 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747980756104 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130823222047 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130896632318 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150358371387 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 709.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6339869281 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51431036059 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0991831688 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15083680513 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747980756104 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130823222047 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130896632318 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150358371387 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.