To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Every year, universities all over the world are ranked in some well-known global ranking to determine top universities in all areas so university administers interested in improving their education level in order to be one of the choices of the student to attend. In order to promote them, some universities decide to raise the salary of professors while others believe otherwise. I subscribe to the second viewpoint on the ground of two main reasons which represent upon hereunder.
To begin with, in my opinion, fascinating students is the proper way of university progress rather than boosting professors' salary. In fact, stimulating student's eagerness tends to make their teachers far more effective. There is a rational relation between students' curiosity and teachers' motivation. So, decision-makers in the university should consider more the students' requirements for instance laboratory and library equipment. Library with abundant applicable books can make them more curious in the way of learning new things. Also, carrying out experiments in a well-equipped laboratory may ignite students' passion in their academic experimental ways. Moreover, it is better to pay money to hold conferences and academic races and rewarding admirable students. Besides, instead of raising teachers' salaries, it would be better to be careful and hire worthy teachers.
Second, another way for educational improvement is paying money for welfare benefits since students have some troubles in their education period which occupied their mental capacities and inhibit/prevent/stop/avoid/avert them from making their best effort to succeed in university. Since a prosperous university must have prosperous students, administers should pay attention to students' welfare benefits. Universities should have well-equipped dormitories near the campus to cutback students' expenses. Also, it must have/possess a self-service with a proper environment for all students and serve nutritious foods at a low price for students to afford. Moreover, the university can pay a monthly salary to students and prevent them from doing a part-time job and just focus on their lessons and academic activities without any concerns about living expenses. Therefore, students do not have any obstacle to occupy their minds and time and dedicate their whole time to scientific research.
To draw a conclusion grounded on the above statements, in my perspective universities should pay attention to students more than teachers in the way of success. In other words, administers can pay money for students' academic requirements including library and laboratory and welfare benefits instead of raising teachers' salaries, since the eagerness of students has more effect on the prosperity of university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 73
- Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past 73
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 80
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 70
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 990, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir whole time to scientific research. To draw a conclusion grounded on the abo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68115942029 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30714349063 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524154589372 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.051130481 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.789473684 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270694554968 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856574906764 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718822879754 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1807944566 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344065913162 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.