The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting on the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the number of participants of two genders who joined the Olympics while the line chart illustrates the number of athletes who took part in the Olympics between 1924 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the total number of participants increased significantly in this period. Besides, the number of males who participated Olympics was always higher than female participants.
From the first glance in the line chart, the number of athletes climbed dramatically over the 88 years. In 1924, just about 3000 participants in the Olympics however this figure doubled in 1984. In the following 28 years, the number of athletes hit the highest point around 10,000 people.
With the regard to the bar chart, it can be seen a reasonable increase in both genders. By 1924, the number of male participants was 3000 and increased to 6000 athletes in 2012. In addition, the number of female participants was witnessed significant growth from under 1000 people in 1924 to approximately 5000 people in 2012. On the other hand, there was a noticeable decreased in distance between men and women who joined this competion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | dhananjaydeej | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | quykute291203 | 95 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | rajpatel90 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 67
- Some people thank that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their style Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010
- The process shows how waste glasses bottles are recycled Write a report of at least 150 words describing the main details 56
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80464842531 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1519230211 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119815983985 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529636804191 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440433481472 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892098221967 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369780600187 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80464842531 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1519230211 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119815983985 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529636804191 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440433481472 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892098221967 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369780600187 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.