The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the people with no work, no job situation in Australia in the year 2012. In the chart, the x-axis illustrates the parts of a year & the y-axis illustrates the percentage of unemployment.
Overall, At the first of the year, the unemployment of rural is more than the urban areas. But from time to time, the unemployment of rural areas decreased & unemployment in urban areas increased. And lastly, their rate became same.
Firstly in the rural areas, among fourth part of the year, in the first part, we see that unemployment is about 6.5%. Then unemployment gradually decreased in the second part of the year. Again in the third part of the year, the unemployment rate was about 5%. In the last part of the year, the unemployment was 5%.
Secondly in the urban areas, in the first part, we see that unemployment is about 2.2%. Then unemployment gradually increased up to second part & it was 4%. Then again it decreased & became 2.1% in the third part of the year. Then at last part of the year, the unemployment rate become 5%.
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 61
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 84
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he year, the unemployment rate was about 5%. In the last part of the year, the un...
^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ame 2.1% in the third part of the year. Then at last part of the year, the unemploym...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73913043478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77906061621 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407608695652 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9962693141 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.0769230769 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1538461538 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.13902439024 966% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167421215481 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798467333554 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456261540694 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11657469301 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349379524385 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.22 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.