Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the issue of history education has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that learning history should take precedence over studying other subjects, such as science and technology, while others argue otherwise. And I wholeheartedly agree with the latter stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that educating history is crucial rather than other subjects. Proponents of this argument insist that learning history gives people an opportunity to reflect on our ancestors' misbehaviour, preventing them from committing the same mistakes that happened in the past, such as imperialism and colonisation. Furthermore, we have to take responsibility for bequeathing our history to future generations considering that history education makes it possible for them to have patriotism as well as to feel a sense of belonging to their mother country.
My opinion, however, is that teaching science and technology should be a priority. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that graduates who majored in science and technology are more likely to find employment opportunities with greater ease because there are a number of prestigious and well-paying occupations in this technologically-advanced era. Another convincing reason is that people who have a tight grasp of knowledge related to science and technology can contribute to the development of our society. To be more specific, people with a deeper understanding of science and technology can devise a multitude of groundbreaking solutions to contemporary issues that human beings face, meaning that not only can they lessen the impact of climate change but they can save a myriad of people suffering from global hunger. Given these points, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that emphasis should be placed on science and technology compared to history for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | sahil nain | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | englishessays | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | shalin63 | 84 | view |
- Q In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss bo 84
- Q15 University and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Q19 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development Some people think that financial aid is important Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important Discuss both these 89
- Q10 Development in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that studying...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48780487805 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15321144474 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576219512195 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.0168836288 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291867608819 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092032811149 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410560465826 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163248274075 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429827804423 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.