All types of container in Vietnam should be banned. To what extents do you agree or disagree?
Container is the main mean of transport which is used to deliver goods in almost every corner in Vietnam. However, there is an arousing voice that a ban should be enforced to all kinds of container. I am not in favor of this statement. My opinion and reasons for it will be discussed in greater detail in the following.
Containers come up against a lot of criticism because of its disadvantage. They endanger well-beings and lives of passengers. Containers are too huge in size when compared to traffic conditions in such a developing country like Vietnam. They not only put pressure on streets but also invade the area of transportation of other people. The former may make streets become weaker, which puts passengers in jeopardy and demand regular renovations. Traffic infrastructure in Vietnam is only at a decent level, with many rough narrow roads which may contain pot holes. The latter deteriorates the experience of Vietnamese passengers in conditions. These factors raise the dispute among many people that they demand all kinds of container to be banned.
I am not an advocate of this opinion. As a matter of fact, containers an crucial part in the industry, which contributes to Vietnam’s finance and many aspects of life. Vietnam is a developing country, so its budgets are limited. Containers cost much less than ships or airplanes. In industrial parks, the distances between factories is not so long so people prefer using containers. Containers also takes fewer procedures than other delivering means of transport. As a result, containers cannot be replaced by any other means of transport at the moment.
To conclude, despite the drawbacks that containers bring about, I assume that containers should not be banned in order to accelerate the industry and finance of Vietnam.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
- All types of container in Vietnam should be banned To what extents do you agree or disagree 61
- All types of container in Vietnam should be banned To what extents do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicals intended for human uses Others however think it is cruel and unnecessary to do that Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicals intended for human uses Others however think it is cruel and unnecessary to do that Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: huge
...lives of passengers. Containers are too huge in size when compared to traffic conditions in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...pinion. As a matter of fact, containers an crucial part in the industry, which con...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10169491525 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92989229977 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.903604812 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.25 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236232481381 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656501066199 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653331912599 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169966055097 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544923533396 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.