People have different job expectations for jobs. Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company, whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently. What are advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint?
These days, people go to work for different purposes. While some individuals tend to remain in their current position, others opt to try different jobs in their life. Each of these standpoints has its own benefits and drawbacks which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, staying in the same position may be attractive to some extent. Stability allows employees to focus on gaining experience and expertise in their specific profession. In the long run, they will be able to prove their capacity, along with their loyalty to the company, which possibly means greater rewards, or even chances of promotion during their working process. However, sticking to the same job throughout their life may sound tedious and monotonous. For example, a teacher's daily working routine involves going to school in the morning, meeting the same colleagues and students, teaching the same lectures and going home, which is a repeated process. This may lead to a gradual loss of enthusiasm about the job, thus declining the productivity.
On the other hand, the idea of regular job hopping also has its own attractiveness. People who opt for this path will have an opportunity to learn new knowledge and skills of different fields, which may be beneficial in their career growth. In this way, they may also find out their true passion and talent to pursue in their life. Nevertheless, extensive job hopping may show a lack of loyalty and professionalism. In turn, this possibly makes potential employers reluctant to invest their time and resources in recruiting and training these employees.
To conclude, whether sticking to a job for a long time or changing jobs regularly, each choice exposes its own merits and demerits. Therefore, people should carefully considerate before making a decision in their career path.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | essay0.6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | essay0.6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | essay0.6 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | huynhanhthuB1909001 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | huynhanhthuB1909001 | 61 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it however others prefer to give money to the national or private charities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14141414141 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76155039712 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4405427758 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244222480218 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876543718054 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713805934852 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175557265174 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412291476226 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.