Science and technology will one day be able to solve all our society's problems.
Science and technology has become a part and parcel of our daily lives. Today's world is totally unimaginable without it. The human race has made a remarkable development, be it eradicating deadly diseases or getting things done in a touch of a button, life has become simplified and sophisticated at the same time. However, societal problems are not limited to the scope of science and technology.
Scientific reasearch and development can progress in such a way that man can increase his longevity and life expectancy rate. Technology can give a hand in solving day to day physical problems faced by humans. Nevertheless, problems like communal tensions, relationship problems, familial institutions, etc will always remain outside its scope. Consider that a husband and wife who have two children want to get a divorce, science and technology can do nothing in the interest of the two kids to resolve their situation. Another case is where the communal riots happen between christians and muslims. Caste tensions are instigated often in vaious regions of the world for which science or technology has got nothing to offer.
Whenever an earthquake or tsunami is about to occur, science and technology can barge in by predicting the mishap and give timely warning thereby saving thousands of lives. Nonetheless, the destruction caused by such a catastrophic event leads to the loss of several livelihoods which is out of the scope of science or technology. In such instances only the advise of our ancestors might work well. We need to learn a lot from historical events in such cases.
Science and technology is sure to be credited for the good quality of food we eat today, but who is to be blamed for the unsustainable resources we have put in for that? We have developed a lot of architecture, for both living space and recreational/entertainment activities, but who is to be blamed for the loss of green cover we have sacrificed for that? We have used our water resources for varied purposes with technological advancement including but not restricted to generated electricity, but who is to be blamed for the dried up lands which were once cleanest and primary source of drinking?
Until the last tree has died, the last river is dried and the last fish is fried, man cannot eat money. So it is our responsibility to be wise and limit the use of science and technology which comes at a cost of our resources. Therefore, we should not see science and technology as a panacea to our problems. We have to make development in a sustainable way and be in a win-win situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all our society s problems 75
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e or technology. In such instances only the advise of our ancestors might work well. We ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
... technology. In such instances only the advise of our ancestors might work well. We ne...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r problems. We have to make development in a sustainable way and be in a win-win situation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92448512586 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0866605005 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530892448513 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7499657673 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.476190476 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8095238095 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04761904762 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258188493838 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785229898982 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737371227588 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139143038237 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434000333753 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.