The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, opinions are divided regarding whether enhancing parental techniques is the most effective way to decrease juvenile delinquency. In my point of view, I am opposed to such an idea since it does not comprehensively deter young people involving crimes and other measures are needed.
Equipping parents with skills might be advocated to reduce young crimes since there are several couples ignorant of how to raise children well; therefore, they may have difficulties in shaping their children’s mindset. This to inappropriate education such as using violent punishments to discipline their children which may develop aggressive behaviours among them when growing up. However, improving child - raising is not sufficient as parents have to handle a large number of tasks nowadays, thereby being unable to observe their children frequently. This coupled with the fact that children expend almost their time on learning at school, meaning that they tend to be more affected by school education than household one. Arming parents with skill only has partial impacts on crime rate among the youth; thus, such idea should be rejected.
In lieu of promoting parent’s child - rearing, other viable solutions should be adopted to curb the crime rate among the youth. First of all, authorities should supply vocational courses for the youth. In fact, some adolescents carry out illegal activities merely to make ends meet. When young people are trained for jobs, they could find better occupations with high income which enable them to cover their lives. As a result, a significant percentage of young crime will be diminished. Moreover, governments should impose stringent regulations on young offenders such as putting on probation or long prison sentences for young criminals . This would be the deterrent for those who are inclined to criminality.
In conclusion, developing parental skills is not the most sensible action to cut down the rate of young criminals and other proposals should be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-02 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | chirag1234 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people spend a lot of money attending cultural or sports events is it a good or bad thing Give your opinion and example from your own experience 78
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ot sufficient as parents have to handle a large number of tasks nowadays, thereby being unable to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 639, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ong prison sentences for young criminals . This would be the deterrent for those w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4253968254 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76489497074 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4274544239 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.933333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224330718792 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730783251824 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605797548334 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125524425744 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583558684187 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.