Medical technology increases life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse?
Recently, owing to the advances made in the medical field, humans' life expectancy has risen drammatically. For instance, in some developed countries, the average life expectancy can exceed 80 years. While this is often considered a positive development, some people believe that there are disadvantages associated with it. In my opinion, although I agree that it is beneficial to prolong people's lives, in a few cases, this may also bring drawbacks.
On the one hand, medical technology that extends humans' lives can offer numerous benefits to the elderly. To start with, not only does it help people to live longer, but it also enhance the quality of life. As old citizens have spent a long time contributing to the society, they deserve to enjoy a favourable retirement, which lasts decently and is almost illness-free. Moreover, children of the older people tend to seize more time to take a good care of their parents, since they were overwhelmed with work and study when they were younger. These days, medical systems in many countries in the world could help to fulfill this need.
On the other hand, an extended life would pose difficulties for the government. First of all, as the number of elderly people increases, the budget for social welfare is likely to be under pressure. This is attributed to the expenditures of paying pensions to the retired workers. Furthermore, it is necessary for the authority to introduce more nurturing homes, hospitals, and employ more medical staff. Since a large percentage of workers would be employed to support the elderly, many industries are likely to face the lack of human resources.
In conclusion, as discussed, prolonging people’ lives can give them and their families many benefits. Nevertheless, there will be some problems which the government have to address when their government live a significantly longer life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-30 | nahhan | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | nahhan | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | Gurjinder kaur 01 | 56 | view |
- Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country development and progress What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 84
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others think that drivers should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 178, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
...help people to live longer, but it also enhance the quality of life. As old citizens ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment live a significantly longer life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16393442623 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85853131695 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616393442623 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2035302965 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138424176254 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462083973143 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595112179147 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782991451172 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423969808271 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.