Percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features
The table gives information about the number of people that used different functions of their mobile phone in three years, 2006, 2008, and 2010.
Overall, seven features of phones experienced an increase over the period while the proportion of making calls had a gradual decrease. It was noticeable that searching the internet surged significantly from the table.
As can be seen, making calls was the highest percentage of these features, standing at approximately 100 percent in two years, 2006 and 2008. However, there was a slight fall, about 1% in 2010. In addition, the figures of taking photos, sending & receiving text messages, playing games, and playing music witnessed a stable increase such as taking photos rose from 66% in 2006 to 76% in 2010.
According to the table, it revealed that in 2006 people did not play music and search the internet compared to other functions. Nevertheless, the data of searching the internet climbed quickly, to 73% in 2010. Moreover, recording video rose rapidly about four times in 2010 compared to that in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries 68
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people traveling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people traveling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13218390805 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63362247616 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0475920833 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114269651387 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415252688116 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733562105145 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839844635782 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864681537144 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.