The charts below show population statistics in two countries of the UK from 1700 to 2000.
The charts give information about the status of the population of two different nations of the UK between 1700 and 2000.
Looking from an overall perspective, the total residents of the two countries, both rose significantly for the whole survey. Meanwhile, the birth and mortality rates of those nations dropped throughout the time frame.
As the chart portrays, the population of Wales and England grew remarkably over the period. To be precise, those number origin was 5 million before climbing to more than 10 million in the afterward centuries. From 1800 to 1900 and 1900 to 2000, the figures still increased, with the former had a more intense tendency. To be precise, the summer residents soared by 30 million in the 1800s compared to the bouncing of 15% in the 1900s.
The birth and death proportion in England reached 30% and 25% respectively at the beginning. Subsequently, in 1800, they simultaneously showed a moderate rise and widened their distance by 15%. In the 1900s, they returned to their initial gap, but occupied 10% lower than the start. The statistics present that no variation was witnessed in the birth rate, while that of mortality plunged to less than 10% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | hoang tuan minh | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | kyunglin13 | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | dangcongkhai | 65 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 50
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applying for universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008 78
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000 78
- the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre 55
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75353863238 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.4565464596 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4545454545 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213651347657 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684492206056 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950390095558 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138781191407 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115406034272 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.