In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Companies must adapt their products to be more acceptable and appealing to consumers as a result of the growth of brands and the new customer trend in recent days. It is, in my opinion, a terrible development.
The reason of the way production of products is to enhance one strength in businesses' items and make that strength to be unique. Otherwise, their products will be decent and less attractive than other brands. For example, IPhone always showed as the fastest and most convenient phone in the world because their OS is unique and easy for beginners such as elder to utilize, and so their design. People's curiosity for fasciating and bizarre items now are new tendency.
However, if businesses take huge care of strength and ignore the weakness of their products , they will receive the bad rate from users and it affects the income of companies. In addition, a number of businesses are lies to customers about the quality of items through advertising. Take McDonald as an example, in their advertising video. The hamburger is fresher and more scrumptious than reality. It is a fact that those companies that make unrealistic advertising video will change customer's attitude to their items detrimentally.
In conclusion, Businesses before present their products have to understand about customer psychology and be honest with them.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nd ignore the weakness of their products , they will receive the bad rate from use...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13698630137 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82495886023 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579908675799 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3725104154 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238609529836 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833911633314 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487048263484 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142466272576 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284195280396 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.