Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Making the right decision in a different situation and critical moment plays an essential role in our lives. We should learn this ability, how we can control ourselves and keep calm in various conditions. It probably happens to most of us in the classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in our opinion, so we have some opportunities to do in this position. From my vantage point in conditions like this, we should say nothing because we don't know the speakers' reaction. Also, interrupting someone's speaks is rude behavior, and it probably distracts their mind. I express two apparent reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
First, people have different behavior in various conditions. No one can predict their reaction, so we should have control over our conduct in society. We must know where we should speak or act and where to keep calm and be silent. From my vantage point, in the classroom or meeting, we aren't sure we can help with correcting speakers' mistakes because it can happen to everyone who makes mistakes when having a speech in a big salon or huge classroom under lots of pressure and stress. Tiredness is another cause it can impact making a mistake, so it is good for our character to be silent and not say anything. Moreover, maybe when we try to correct their error, it makes them mad and nervous and makes the condition worse than before.
Second, it is possible speakers say their idea, and in their mind, it is no mistake, and it is wrong or incorrect just for us, not for them. We all know this fact, people have a different opinions, and they have the right to express their idea freely, and nobody can claim it is a mistake. Most of the time, if we try to correct it, we face their opposition. Sometimes we can be correct, and the speaker has a mistake, but it is hard to push someone to change their opinion or ideas, and it is useless. So being calm and silent can help us prevent it from occurring.
To sum up, from where I stand, being calm and not interrupting someone's speech in the classroom or meeting, even when we think the speaker has a mistake, is the best decision we can make for two main reasons. First, it might be they be under challenging conditions or have stress, and it is expected they have mistakes and our interrupting make them more anxious also it is a rude act. Second, maybe it is the speaker's idea, and we don't push them to change their mind, and we don't know if we say how they react, so being silent and saying nothing is the best decision we can make.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 70
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 3
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 81
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... this, we should say nothing because we dont know the speakers reaction. Also, inter...
^^^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...ld say nothing because we dont know the speakers reaction. Also, interrupting someones s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... point, in the classroom or meeting, we arent sure we can help with correcting speake...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opinion'?
Suggestion: opinion
...know this fact, people have a different opinions, and they have the right to express the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 410, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
... is a rude act. Second, maybe it is the speakers idea, and we dont push them to change t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., maybe it is the speakers idea, and we dont push them to change their mind, and we ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... push them to change their mind, and we dont know if we say how they react, so being...
^^^^
Line 4, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing is the best decision we can make.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51835853132 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49307312553 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438444924406 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8261527935 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.619047619 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0476190476 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103208291601 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038248588901 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596237869953 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757124464703 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360701720524 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.