IN THE FUTURE ALL CARS BUSES AND TRUCKS WILL BE DRIVERLESS. THE ONLY PEOPLE TRAVELLING INSIDE THESE VEHICLES WILL BE PASSENGERS.
DO YOU THINK THE ADVANTAGES OF DRIVERLESS VEHICLES OUTWEIGHT THE DISADVANTAGES?
It is claimed that automated vehicles will soon replace normal cars and buses. From my viewpoint, though robots may phase out many jobs, their advantages vastly outstrip the drawbacks, especially in terms of safety and convenience.
In the modern world, drivers with lower skills and experience will definitely lose their jobs. AI technology can undertake their roles in driving cars so people do not need to pay much money to hire drivers. Instead, buying robots only once can help them make a profit. As a result, millions of people will become unemployed and the overall economy of a country may decrease significantly.
On the other hand, driverless cars can guarantee the safety of users better than real humans. For instance, when going on a tour with up to 10-hour drive, the drivers may feel tired so their sense of feeling may not be fully accurate. During this time, a sudden accident may occur and the drivers cannot handle the situation, leading to the injury of passengers. However, robots will always be activated with full energy so they can manage unexpected problems. They can also calculate the danger beforehand and give solutions in time, so everyone will be safer.
Moreover, with the development of AI technology, every trip will be more convenient. Driverless cars can be operated automatically and they will run on the set routes, optimizing the driving time so we can have more time to invest in our work. If automated cars are used in public, we will not need to spend money on buying cars or refueling them but saving for future plans. In other words, using driverless vehicles makes our lives easier.
In conclusion, though automated vehicles lead to jobs losing, their merits are still valuable and worth considering. Therefore, everyone should try to apply them in the reality and create more jobs to maintain our lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-25 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | ducphanhuy98 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | thomas242 | 84 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 78
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems what are the problems what can be done to solve the problems 56
- It is believed that computers will be more intelligent than human beings in the future While some think of this as a positive development others worry about the negative consequences of automation Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'job'.
Suggestion: job
...sion, though automated vehicles lead to jobs losing, their merits are still valuable...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 7.85571142285 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00967741935 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59556373311 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603225806452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3473112486 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.3529411765 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242185677609 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768350121141 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489865004161 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125236979631 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655750883207 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.