In any profession — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
To conduct organizations for a long-term development and sustainability the higher authorities must be foresighted and sophisticated. Those who are in power in any profession play the main roles of the organization. So, it is significant to choose the proper person for conducting these main responsibilities. The prompt recommended that in any profession those in power should resign after five years. I mostly agree with this recommendation because of strategical and task variation in different organization.
To begin, working for a long time one, who is in the top position of the profession, might be thought himself superior to others. He or she will always try to get extra facilities and become harsh to others. It will destroy the working environments of the profession and create a horrible mental stress among the other employees. For instance, in the time of emperor, the general people were always scared to the king and his subordinators. But now in democratic countries government authorities are changed after certain years. So, the powerful persons can't be domineering because of losing the power after certain years and the support of general public. So, it is a good idea to step down the powerful persons after five years which to keep a sound environment in those fields.
At next, there is a possibility of being corrupted for whom, holding the powerful position for a long time due to absence of explanation. A powerful person, who will withdraw after five years, keep in mind he would be taken under explanation for doing wrong things during his time. For this reason, he or she must keep away from in wrong-doing and. So, it will be a fruitful system to step down after five years for the organizations.
In concession, though it is effective, step down after five years, in many ways, long term development will be hindered for this reason. The initiatives, taken for long term improvement might not be liked by the next authorities. They obviously run the organization in their own views. And every profession is not alike, they vary from one another based on their goal. However, different people have different ideas, instead of long-term thinking new ideas can be generated for the development of professional activities by stepping down after five years.
To conclude, though the recommendation is given in the prompt is a complex issue, after above discussion the recommended idea is better in many professions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | Isolus | 66 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignoring negative ones 50
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 64
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What to extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...is subordinators. But now in democratic countries government authorities are changed afte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...certain years. So, the powerful persons cant be domineering because of losing the po...
^^^^
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... after certain years and the support of general public. So, it is a good idea to step down the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09701492537 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05297667329 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509950248756 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3520729672 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1363636364 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267455046117 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873770083586 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111466854629 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146448731747 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670102822727 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.