Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Young people usually like to get famous quickly, but they should be encouraged to set up realistic goals because it is important for young people to have long-term educational plans to get good jobs in the future and make their own lives.
Long-term goals can be frustrating sometimes; however, the consequence will be worthy. For example, a young girl who wants to be a dietitian should study for four years to get a clinical nutrition bachelor. In addition, she should pass a ten months dietetic internship and the registered dietitian exam after that to be able to work as a dietitian. It is obvious that she is going to have tight schedules. Moreover, she should study hard to reach her dreams. Consequently, she will become a RD even if it took time for her.
Additionally, young people are usually passionate about trips and vacations that is good but only sometimes because they need to save some money for their plans too. Imagine a same RD girl who has a fulltime job; however, she goes to expensive travels with her friends every year. As a result, she is going to have money problems soon. Instead of spending unnecessary money, she can make a money plan to make sure that she can be an independent person in her life that is more important than having fun.
On the contrary, most young people believe that they only born one time, so they should enjoy their lives and get things immediately; however, most of the time fame and success come quickly and disappear quickly too. For example, consider a young girl who likes to get famous among her friends by going to parties and dancing on the floor. As a result, she might get happy which is a good entertainment for her and her friends, but everybody is going to forget her eventually that is not going to be a realistic goal for her.
In conclusion, long-term goals are beneficial because young people can stay on track and become successful persons one day. Immediate recognition is every young's dream; however, quick fame will vanish soon. To make improvements in our lives we need to have goals even if reaching them is going to take a long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Jeyodi | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Snehil Dey | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | srijita02 | 79 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | srijita02 | 79 | view |
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67292225201 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57055490458 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495978552279 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7282054391 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.529411765 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194236270774 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659641799941 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514323824466 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127283656826 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464371131117 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.