Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Zoos have always been a topic of interest as they raise a question of whether people should keep them as a vital means for animal researches or knock them down for ethical reasons. From my perspective, I suppose although zoos do interfere with the natural habitat of some species their indispensable role in environment conservation, as well as their contribution to science, should not be neglected
On the one hand, many people are opposed to zoos because they believe humans have no right to use animals for entertainment and profit. Animals that are kept in captivity can be deprived of their freedom, leading to the massive loss of their basic instincts, such as predating, searching for food, etc. Therefore, the way people capture wildlife animals in cages to attract more tourists and earn more money is considered to be immoral and the biodiversity would be devastated in general
On the other hand, the main mission of zoos is not making money but providing suitable conditions for endangered species and allowing scientists to have further insights into the animals’ behaviours. Specifically, many animals are on the verge of extinction, for instance: pandas, rhinos, or gorillas, which can be threatened by predators or unable to reproduce in their environment. Also, scientists can go to zoos to conduct advanced researches on these species, thus, discovering more solutions to preserve them. As a result, zoos do not only do wonders for certain species at the moment but the whole ecosystem in a long term
To conclude, although zoos have been doubted for their values for so many decades. I strongly believe that if being used properly, zoos can be a wonderful way for not only conserving rare or endangered species but also provoking more remedies for some environmental issues nowadays
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | amellia1607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | thuthao2000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | stewies | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | xuanmailonton | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 67
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 73
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i suppose, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11486486486 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8850243665 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.1506418508 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.25 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.25 7.06120827912 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247661284139 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119135411955 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498059619143 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168045116895 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204180649062 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.