Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days.
Why is this? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
Working for five or six days each week has been deemed commonplace for decades in modern society. However, some people assert that reducing the working days of employees down to about three or four days per week would bring more advantages such as relief time. Whilst this idea is compelling, there is strong opposing evidence to refute it.
First and foremost, it is no doubt that so high is the amount of time that people spent at work that they often suffer from stress-related illness. Thus, cutting down one or two working days would give workers more time to recover before they go back to work. Spending time with family, for example, is a great way to utilize those spare time. Subsequently, much more relaxing than before that the employees feel, leading to higher productivity at work. However, causing more stress might be if their working hours are less but the workload is unchanged.
Another benefit of this notion is that more job opportunities are created. A great number of workers are employed to fill in the place or the day that other people left behind. As a result, the problem of unemployment in developed countries will be partly solved. The US, for instance, where jobs are becoming increasingly demanding will find its benefit. And since more people have a stable occupation, there would be fewer crimes taking place. Nonetheless, hiring more staff would put great pressure on firms and human resources departments.
Finally, with the number of times people have to commute, it is likely for the environment, air quality specifically, to be improved. A great deal of carbon emission is cut down as well as the probability of traffic congestions. But it is unlikely that everyone will stay at home because they do not have to go to work.
In conclusion, working less than the usual one or two days surely benefit society in certain ways, however, such a viewpoint can be refused as there are other problems are created by it.
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002 It includes those with a degree those with a higher degree postgraduates and those with other qualifications 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87724550898 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60312597382 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6033969522 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248125463668 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721670424005 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687558324014 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139590530365 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920485198761 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.