Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams (1993)
A glance at the bar chart reveals the figures of students in both gender by percentages, sailing through their final examinations in 9 different subjects in 1993.
In general, girls seemed to be excellent at social science while it was natural science that boys were expert at.
To begin with, it is obvious that pupils always excelled in Maths and English that both gender recorded a considerable figure of approximately 40%, especially in English, female ranked their highest data of 61.5%. However, having constituted virtually 10%, neither boys nor girls got satisfying results in natural science subject (Physics, Chemistry and Biology).
As can be seen from the chart, it is the natural science and technical subject that boys did slightly better than girls. It was depicted by a significant gap of 8% in Technology and trivial portions of ranging from 2% to almost 5% in these 3 natural subjects.
Meanwhile, female were more proficient at social science than boys, which was vividly illustrated by the data of English, French and History, making some significant differences of 17.1%, 12.5% and 6.5% respectively.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct E g Dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Technology has brought so many changes that modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past Do you think the positive effects of technology outweigh its disadvantages 56
- Percentage of pupils who passed their final exams 1993 11
- Reading is an important activity to you You answer the question in the form of an essay of approximately 250 words 80
- The diagram below shows the different stages in the manufacturing and use of steel 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26519337017 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81180190777 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651933701657 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5333145023 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0688179555623 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320544979225 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538724025456 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410688705003 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057387252116 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.