Possible Application of Airships
Both the article and lecture discuss the possible application of airships in place of airplanes or helicopters. Whilst the author of the article claims that the airships are advantageously mentioning three specific reasons, the lecturer contends the author claims simultaneously. In his opinion, the airships, though beneficial, have limited advantages over the other mentioned means of air transportation which is discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
The author, in the reading, begins by mentioning that rather than using an engine for both the vertical and horizontal movement, airships tend only to use engines for horizontal movement only. Consequently, airships consume less fuel depicting it as cost-economic air transportation. The lecturer, however, refutes the particular position of the author maintaining the inadequacy of gases required for the vertical lift. The lighter than air gases: hydrogen and helium, employed in the airships for the vertical have diverse disadvantages. Hydrogen has the high capability to catch the fire quickly supported by several tragic accidents in the past whereas helium being safe to hydrogen, is not easily accessible for regular usage. Additionally, the speaker mentions the lower vertical lifting power of the gas to support his claim.
The writer further asserts that airships are favorable in difficult locations such as forests which requires limited space as compared to the requirement of a long runway for the airplanes and the capability of the helicopters to carry a small amount of the weight. On the other hand, the speaker questions the claim made by the writer mentioning the ascendance and descendants of airships must be slower and careful in such areas. Thus, it will be a laborious task to maintain the balance of the airships specifically in the windy conditions where accidents from the collision with trees are highly probable.
Further, the article mentions that airships can be a feasible medium in exchange for the satellite to carry out military operations. The article adds that airships aid not only in transporting the paramount telecommunication equipment and other surveying necessities but also maintains significantly cheaper costs. As opposed to the article’s opinion, the lecturer posits that the airships can be reached up to 14Km above the earth's surface where the movement of the wind is abundant. As result, it needs a greater amount of fuel to resist the wind forces acting on it. On top of that, he adds because of the higher fuel usage it is necessary for the airship to return to the surface frequently which makes its application inefficacious.
To summarize, the writer and the speaker have opposing viewpoints on the benefits of airships. On this topic, it's evident that they'll have a hard time finding common ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-03 | ManishAdh | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | serena_wus | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Kalima | 76 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | divyajose7@yahoo.com | 70 | view |
| 2015-12-05 | sherko | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires limited" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'limiting' or 'to be limited'.
Suggestion: limiting; to be limited
...ocations such as forests which requires limited space as compared to the requirement of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...rships. On this topic, its evident that theyll have a hard time finding common ground....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, whereas, as for, as to, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1373.03311258 173% => OK
No of words: 443.0 270.72406181 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37020316027 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01630819871 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 145.348785872 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539503386005 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 419.366225166 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9322019401 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.210526316 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3157894737 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239228487878 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720637877713 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946348472784 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117167580264 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762252382404 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 63.6247240618 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.