The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The two given bar charts illustrate the volume of money which is devoted and supplied by a children’s charity situated in the USA in 2016. As can be seen from the bar charts, the largest part of revenue sources has come from donated food. While program services were considered as the most significant part of expenditures.
Firstly, donated food made up over 85% of the revenue sources, which nearly tripled that of all other combinations. Next, community contributions and program povonuo were at sightly upper 10% and 2%, respectively. Investment income stayed at 0.2%, equaling the figure for government grants. Finally, other income was only 0.4%.
Secondly, fundraising accounted for over 2.5% of expenditures which is higher than that of management and general by 1%. Remaining at slightly under 96%, program services were the largest parts in comparison with others in both bar charts in 2016. Finally, the total amount of money that a charitable organization received seemed to equal to the amount of money this organization used in 2016, at over 53,5 million dollars and 53,2 million dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-09 | nemcutehotme | view | |
| 2022-02-04 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | TUAN MINH | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | asmita acharya | 87 | view |
- Some people say that art painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that government should invest money in science education rather than other subjects to develop country 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- vv 11
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most significant part of expenditures. Firstly, donated food made up over 85% o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Finally, other income was only 0.4%. Secondly, fundraising accounted for over...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1843575419 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80492551209 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642458100559 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1996359207 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118581348586 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394293490948 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651258416577 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077351819327 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556627790347 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.