The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph represents various sources of air contaminants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
In general, it can be seen that the total amount of air pollutants decreases sharply from 1990 to 2005. The most striking fall was from industrial zones.
In 1990, the total number of air pollutants was 7 million tonnes. This figure fell significantly to 4 million tonnes in 1999 and continued to decline to over 3 million tonnes in 2005.
It is noticeable that the amount of industry contaminants declines significantly from nearly 5.5 million tonnes in 1990 to 2 million tonnes in 2005 with a slight fall between 1993 and 1996. The was a difference between the number of industrial air pollutants and 2 other sources; air pollution from transportation and households was much lower than the one from industrial areas. Air contamination from transportation remained at 1 million tonnes; whereas, there was a minor reduction from the number of household air pollutants from 1 million in 1990 to nearly 0.2 million tonnes in 2005.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese Islands 56
- Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years Why do you think this has happened Is it a positive or negative development 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97660818713 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97077174561 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.844079213 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240513717834 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140308736915 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908217120196 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192966397284 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873240915866 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.