Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people reckon that travelers should acclimate to local traditions in the countries where they come to visit, the opposite view argues that these countries should accept new cultures from the visitors. Both viewpoints are justifiable, but I personally lean towards the latter.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why tourists should observe regional customs and behaviour. One of them is that if visitors do not acclimate to the host country’s customs, they might be considered being unfriendly to locals. In fact, because of cultural differences, many native people cannot understand the visitors' actions or habits, leading to unnecessary misunderstandings. For example, in Thailand, tourists should not look at women for more than two seconds, otherwise, it will be considered a rule, which may be common in many European countries. Another reason is that travelers will enjoy the traditions and be able to take part in community life. It will be regrettable when people visit a destination without involving in cultural activities or local festivals; therefore, following some customs of other regions also is an exciting way to enjoy travel.
On the other hand, I believe that the host country should welcome cultural distinctions from other countries because of the considerable benefits it can receive. Firstly, cultural interference will bring countries a perfect opportunity to enhance tourism. Welcoming the various habits of tourists will form a sense of satisfaction and friendliness between residents and travelers, which helps people easier to communicate and exchange the respective customs with each other. Additionally, thanks to this acceptance, the destinations can vary entertainment activities to attract more visitors and also contribute to developing that state's tourism industry. In other words, cultural difference is essential in every aspect of life as it leads to innovation, productivity, problem-solving, and new opportunities. For instance, in the work, cultural distinctions are unavoidable when many people often work with foreign consumers with different behaviours. In this situation, people certainly must accept and adopt new customs to achieve most efficiently and catch successful opportunities.
In conclusion, it can be undeniable that travelers should respect different cultures and traditions, I believe that tourist destinations should be open to the cultural diversity and embrace fresh things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | ngthanh1220@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | qminh. | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | niloya | 73 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 75
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Billions of US dollars 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 The US 9 7 10 5 13 5 18 22 7 EU countries 3 3 3 4 3 8 3 67
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72207084469 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16495071631 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574931880109 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4482450739 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362248798444 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108645907602 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941125772088 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220096391561 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543701721504 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72207084469 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16495071631 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574931880109 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4482450739 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362248798444 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108645907602 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941125772088 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220096391561 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543701721504 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.