Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is believed that money is being squandered on the arts by the administration, instead of spending it on more vital things such as education and sport. I partially agree with this view and believe it is acceptable.
On the one hand, arts play an essential role on development of imagination and cultural knowledge of individuals. In other words, people may get their creativity improved by drawing pictures, moreover, learning and composing poems can also be effective on enhancing people's outlooks. For example, researchs say that a person draws pictures on a regular basis has a tendency to score higher in IQ tests. If the government does not allocate money for the crafts, the number of art museums are likely to decrease. Consequently, this might be the main reason for underestimation of culture.
On the other hand, there are more crucial fields that government should spend money on. For instance, it can be used for improvement of education which may reduce the rate of illiteracy by building an array of schools universities and learning centres. On top of this, for the same amount of investment, more and more sport facilities might be created. As a result, numerous health problems such as obesity and heart diseases, can be solved. Hence, fund could also be invested in other facilities.
To conclude, although education and sport have untold advantages, it would be unfair to invest money which is given to the craft, in other facilities. Thus, both should be placed at the same level of significance in the subject under expenditure
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04651162791 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90815480006 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7265693162 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226061673075 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804062829895 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589772548195 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145159438287 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561426869046 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04651162791 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90815480006 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7265693162 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226061673075 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804062829895 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589772548195 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145159438287 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561426869046 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.