Question 3: Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The responsibility for the environment has always been a topic of controversy. While some people convince that the authorities should take over this responsibility, others believe it is individuals who should shoulder the responsibility. In this essay, I will elaborate on these two viewpoints and give the reasons why I suppose it is beneficial that the responsibility to protect nature falls on both the government and citizens.
On one hand, the government should play a pivotal role in protecting the environment. Firstly, the authorities can use their power to enact effective and potentially costly environmental policies to help protect the environment directly and solve severe natural problems. For example, the government can pass laws to support local producers who practice sustainable ways of food production; therefore, it can offer the chance for people to use global resources more efficiently and stimulate rural livelihoods. Secondly, the government can use its resources to persuade citizens to care for nature more. For instance, there’s no real way for a person to measure how much are they really help the earth by using air conditioning less or recycling but the government can allocate the state budget to analyze positive environmental efforts so that they can motivate people to continue their actions.
On the other hand, government policies and spending cannot be effective unless there is public support so that each person has to take action to protect our ecosystem. Nowadays, plastic pollution has become one of the most pressing environmental issues, especially in developing Asian and African nations, where garbage collection systems are often inefficient or even nonexistent. For that reason, people should change their lifestyles to reduce their reliance on plastic bags such as switching from plastic bottles to refillable bottles or always bringing their own reusable bags.
In conclusion, I believe that environmental problems will constitute existential threats to human societies unless the responsibility for the protection of the environment is shared by both the government and ordinary people
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-23 | Han Duyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | aileean | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | dhruvik_patel | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | paula_ngy08 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-19 | Cynthia Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Question 4 Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Question 4 Some people 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5871559633 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13180008582 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0368058271 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.25 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296185330642 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110970683887 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069677391985 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200470164102 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925921347003 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.