Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In order to become a good resident, it is sometimes argued that children should be taught appropriately within their families while many states that they can only achieve this throughout their school life. In my perspective, a combination of those kinds of teaching approaches could result in better social members.
It is justified that parents are responsible for forming their children to be good people. Firstly, children themselves have a tendency to assimilate knowledge from their parents. This is because parents are regarded as role models for the child to obey. A child, for instance, would imitate their parents, ranging from their attitudes, behaviors to their code of conduct in daily life. Additionally, it is much easier for parents in teaching children rather than teachers in school. As a person who is closely attached to the child at a very young age, upbringing children with a fundamental foundation, father or mother could have more opportunities in shaping their children to become good people.
However, it is undeniable that school plays a key role in forming children’s personality traits to be good residents. First and foremost, school is indeed a more suitable place for children to expose to social relations. This is because school is regarded as a miniature society in which people from all walks of life communicate with others on daily basis. This chance, therefore, makes these children behave appropriately towards each type of people and obtain first-hand experience which itself necessary for them in the future. Moreover, this can be especially feasible for parents who do have insufficient time to spend on teaching their kids. To illustrate, they can give children to school as a way to provide opportunities for their kids to absorb practical knowledge from teachers instead of keeping them at home without any given experiences.
To conclude, a good person is formed by parents or teachers at school is still a topic of debate. With these aforementioned ideas, I do believe that two kinds of this are contributory factors in shaping a better resident of society.
- FEWER YOUNG PEOPLE DO FARMING WORK IN RURAL AREAS WHY SHOULD YOUNG PEOPLE ENCOURAGED TO DO FARMING WORK 84
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 84
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 89
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some people say that it is possible for a county to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both view and give your opinion
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2082111437 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89746161981 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6849069331 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226936225546 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843197890155 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424457892623 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14163985006 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411936100239 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.