It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Heroes are men and women us but have some extraordinary sill or stature that make them different from ordinary people, in fact, there is a very limited number of people who can be that extraordinary to become a hero. In the prompt, the author asserts that nowadays it is quite impossible for a society to regard someone, man or woman, as a hero. However, I strongly disagree with the author.
Historically, we are introduced to some great people who are our heroes after their death meaning that the recognition of hero is actually given when they are no longer among us. For example, it is very unlikely that one may find a living legend in a history book. Therefore, there is a stereotype that heroes are dead. Moreover, some people think that the world is now in a position where we do not need a hero to uphold our society because we are developed enough and there is no war in the world. However, both of the aforementioned assumptions are not entirely true.
First of all, we usually ignore some heroic attempts by men or women since they are very common or ordinary to our eyes. For example, in the job of a firefighter, we hardly feel the risk and danger the job is accompanied. Hence, the particular men or women who choose this type of job are not someone very ordinary, rather they are the most unique people among us who take the extreme responsibility of saving humans from dangers. Furthermore, these peoples never deny doing their work, even when it is vulnerable to their life. Therefore, these people are no less than heroes, though their job is very familiar to us, the job is not something that can be done by any of us. This instance proves that it is very plausible for a society to regard a man or woman as a hero.
Secondly, as the world had gone through two drastic and devastating wars, and now the overall situation is calm, everything is running harmoniously, therefore, one might express that there is no need for heroes. However, the recent Covid pandemic tells us a different story. The lethal covid-19 showed us that doctors, nurses, scientists, police or even ordinary person can be a hero. During the epidemic, we saw doctors treating people while risking their own life, scientists were doing intensive research on the virus knowing that it may affect them and eventually fall them to death. Furthermore, the police together with general people were on the field to help other people and maintain a quarantine zone to contain the virus. All these things are no less than heroism, thereby meaning that heroes are living with us and they appear when they are needed most.
In sum, ostensibly, we may maintain that heroes are gone because of our narrow focus on the activities of ‘heroism’. However, they are always within and among us, and society can always regard someone as a hero.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Yam Kumar Oli | 79 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | mojammel1501114 | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | Ahmed.I | 62 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | anon7652 | 54 | view |
- Weather and local news programs 55
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry In order to stop the erosion we should charge people for usi 64
- In our time specialists of all kinds are highly overrated We need more generalists people who can provide broad perspectives 83
- bar 11
- In our time specialists of all kinds are highly overrated We need more generalists people who can provide broad perspectives 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...eone very ordinary, rather they are the most unique people among us who take the extreme re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69959677419 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58564205617 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48185483871 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5659130476 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.954545455 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157538438815 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528026796671 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495441981758 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996089878255 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292765012081 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.