The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Some people believe that traditional attitudes encouraged by the elderly to the youngster are not applicable in modern society. It is agreed as several life conditions changed and the skills needed are more dynamic these days.
The emergence of different life conditions makes traditional approaches derived by the elderly not applicable in modern society, preventing youngsters from leveraging their potential. This is to say that some perspectives are outdated and not relevant to solving current problems. For instance, most elderly might encourage to store wealth in gold as it was a help to them during the 1960s crisis. However, as the geopolitical issue happens today, the gold price is unpredictable, forcing youngsters to opt for a digital asset called Bitcoin, which has the same storing value as gold. Bitcoin price surpassed gold by 200% in 2022, making it the fastest-growing asset among the others.
Another reason why traditional notions are not relevant to people today is the emersion of demanded new skills, combining many skills at once. The emergence of modern technology opens many employment opportunities that need employees to have some intersection of skills to fulfill the labor demand. According to a survey done by McKinsey in 2020, the demanding skill for a social media content creator reached its peak at 70% in companies in Jakarta to leverage their marketing strategy. This occupation did not even exist five years ago, yet it requires presenting, performing, communicating, and editing skills. Hence, asking the elderly about the traditional social media marketing approach will not help.
To conclude, traditional approaches persuaded by the senior generations are not relevant to young societies recently as life has changed and skills demanded vary more than in the past. If possible, the traditional views could only be applied to the cultural aspect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | yeesn | 81 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Nguyen051207 | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their poorer countries to work in developed countries What problem does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 56
- The contribution of various economic sectors to Xcountry Gross Domestic Product in 2016 2017 and 2018 57
- Social Media Effects 61
- Some people think that drug addicts should be treated like criminals and sent to jail while others believe that they should be treated like patients and sent hospital 67
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally crucial for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'storing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: storing
... instance, most elderly might encourage to store wealth in gold as it was a help to them...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4222972973 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90931344646 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60472972973 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7589697412 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15603433207 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530328755451 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441308460778 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103366506142 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482942324251 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.