The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two graphs depicting a classic American and a Japanese office.
Looking at the two maps, it is immediately obvious that in Japanese offices, there tends to be more shared space than American offices. Furthermore, the people in japanese have a traditional way to finish missions by teamwork instead of the individualism of American.
Perceptibly, the disposing layout is completely uncomplicated in Japan. With the open space, managers and staff have a chance to work together. By that way, the efficiency is pushed to the peak. There are two rows in the middle room with 24 chairs for employees. Although the Japanese office is a shared space, there is a small private area for managers to distinct hierarchy. Additionally, a huge window is occupied in the south of the room behind the department manager.
According to the American office map, the accommodation work of staffs as well as managers' acreage or furniture area are obviously disposed of. There are 3 rooms for manager in the east side and 8 tables and chairs for staff. One of the benefits of this office is a convenience and optimality that is represented in the west side. Americans can be easy access to rooms which is serviced for their demands such as printer copier, storage, conference room. Two windows are located in the east side and the west side.
- The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two graphs depicting a classic Amer...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8986784141 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82007838347 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563876651982 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5131413137 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4285714286 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106785684558 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371948531086 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456124724674 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852856124683 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463956355881 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.