The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of cars stolen for every 1000 vehicles in four countries from 1990 to 1999.
It is clearly visible from the line chart that car thefts in Great Britain started at 18 per thousand, which far exceeded that of the other countries. It then fluctuated over the next six years, reaching a peak of 20 thefts per 1000 in 1996, and ending the period slightly lower than where it began, at approximately 17 per thousand.
Further scrutinizing the chart that car thefts in Sweden, France, and Canada followed a fairly similar pattern over the first five years, all remaining at between 5 and 10 per thousand. The general trend though for France and Canada was a decline in the number of vehicles stolen over the period, with both at around 6 in 1999. In contrast, Sweden experienced an upward trend, starting the period at approximately 8, and finishing at just under 15.
Overall, it can be seen that car thefts were far higher in Great Britain than in the other three counties throughout the whole time frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-09-03 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays more and more older people who need employment have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are the solutions 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three years 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons 73
- Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...n, at approximately 17 per thousand. Further scrutinizing the chart that car thefts ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75274725275 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44485738182 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4351343203 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191964213873 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922954557455 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735853551061 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124735338087 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811328563555 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.