The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In modern society, thanks to the development of cutting-edge technology, humans can utilize it to make their life more convenient in the way they interact with others. However, it is thought that social platforms have been changing direct communication. From my perspective, the merits of this innovation eclipse its demerits.
On the one hand, there are several drawbacks of over depending on social media instead of face-to-face communication. Admittedly, direct communication plays an indispensable role these days. In terms of strengthening human bonds, direct interaction does a favor for the circle of groups, which can grasp an opportunity to share things with their soulmates or their relatives. When it comes to formal meetings or appointments, by interacting with each other in person, each meeting may get a consensus easier. Nevertheless, should these situations happen through media sites such as Facebook or Google meet, the relationship and productivity will be affected. For instance, annual seminars of a school occur online and not all participants engage in these activities resulting in bad output and cannot satisfy the school’s requirements. Besides, some groups of friends do not manage any visit, losing their united relationship.
However, it can not be denied that social media has a huge positive impact on human connections. First, due to the long distance, it is difficult for people to meet their friends or relatives in person. Therefore, a device with an Internet connection has made a chance for to people can engage with each other anytime and anywhere. For example, some students who study abroad can easily see their long-lost families on a smartphone. Additionally, people have been living at a fast pace with a heavy workload, and hardly do some people spending their luxury time face-to-face interaction, so media platforms are useful in this situation. Finally, an emergency meeting of any organization can be held anytime, for example in the evening, thus make an online conversation are imperative.
To conclude, although face-to-face interaction brings numerous advantages, I gravitate towards the benefits of online communication as a result of its role in human relationships and their work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47126436782 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16366651798 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9174505947 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169691954199 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538546392227 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718934172678 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107357701043 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411092218231 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.