Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion”
Today, have many people believe that people should be palatable the right to use fresh water when they like. However, others people think that the authorities should driving the use of fresh water. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of people should use fresh water as they like. First, fresh water are believe common water source of the people and equalize living conditions among people regardless of their background. This fresh water support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall use fresh water ore freely of poor income people but also to support their background because have some people just living in motel and water cost is so expensive, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, people can use fresh water freely would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged environment and conditions human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor once people use fresh water as they like. First, offering all people freely use water would likely correspond with the tremendous financial strain on a country. Using water is free could become water shortage, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure because state budget just focus into water exploitation. Second, free access to fresh water would tempt many people including people who don’t know how to save money or over-reliant to n the state, thereby adding great burdens for government or exploitation water staff and potentially wasting more water the these people could have spent money for use fresh water. It, instead would be a more financial viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gift people.
I were discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, people shouldn’t use fresh water as they like and the government should control this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- Many companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is good for the world of sports Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The best way for a government to prepare for the future is to invest in young people To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- The table shows the percentage of adults in urban and rural areas who took part in four free times activities in 1990 and 2010 67
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 67
- The chart below show the average maximum and minimum temperatures between Brisbane and Canberra and the average number of days with rainfall in these two countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
...ing less privileged yet gift people. I were discussed both sides of the argument. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26878612717 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59118351642 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56936416185 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4195251052 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.533333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.555508513143 0.244688304435 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236479290225 0.084324248473 280% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164125383564 0.0667982634062 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421338140616 0.151304729494 278% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714602590144 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.