The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The graph illustrates the quantity of inquiries that the Tourist Information Office in a city received over six months in 2011.
Overall,the figures of inquiries received in person and by telephone experienced an upward trend while enquiries received by letter or mail witnessed a downward trend.
As shown by the graph, most enquiries were received by telephone in January with more than 800 digits. Then, it dropped to exactly 800 enquiries in February and soared to 1000 digits in March. Later in June, the figure reached a high of 1600 enquiries. On the contrary, enquiries received in person had the lowest number with only 400 digits in January. However, it rocketed to 800 enquiries in March and then hit its peak in June with more than 1800 enquiries.
By contrast, enquiries sent by and email started at a high of around 800 digits and left off until March. After that, it fell to less than 600 enquiries in April and hit the bottom in June.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-04 brew 65 view
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-09-01 euphorianmt 84 view
2023-08-03 leuleu28 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
Essays by user lucynton :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...eived over six months in 2011. Overall,the figures of inquiries received in person...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78181818182 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54333244876 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.319604517 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26132801977 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112553477087 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154697913441 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197617554797 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196745731861 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...eived over six months in 2011. Overall,the figures of inquiries received in person...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78181818182 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54333244876 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.319604517 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26132801977 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112553477087 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154697913441 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197617554797 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196745731861 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.