Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, the importance of art in school curricula has been gaining a great deal of attention throughout society to encourage creativity among children. Most importantly, the issue has become a bone contention among academic experts regarding its inclusion in the school syllabus. While some people consider it a wastage of time, I would contend that it should be considered a mandatory subject for a child at a certain level.
On the one hand, art inevitably promotes creativity. This means children who are exposed to art-related activities such as drawing, crafting, painting and many more, develop cognitive functions such as thinking and analytical capability significantly. Therefore, it could be a great trigger to release the inner potentiality of children in their next period of life. An empirical survey conducted in the UK last year reflects the same notion. The surveys show that children who had art in their syllabus till 5th grade were 40% more creative in thinking compared to those who were involved in other issues rather than art. Hence, having art in the school curriculum might be an important initiative for the well-being of nations.
On another hand, in this fiercely competitive arena, some people think that carrier oriented studies namely Science, Math’s and many more to be included only in the school syllabus. By studying such productive subjects, students will understand practical knowledge to beat the competition in the real world and it might play an important role to have a good carrier in future. Moreover, the addition of art to the syllabus will also burden their study load. This can be exemplified by the initiatives in Taiwan for the last few decades where the government is subsidizing the educational cost by emphasizing productive knowledge only. This is reflected in Taiwan’s growth of GDP from 5% to 12% in the last five years. Hence, to them, having art as a school subject seems a waste of time.
All the things considered, the value of art should not be lessened for the sake of a growing economy. I believe young aspirants should be kept away from the typical rat race competition for the sake of their mental development. Our next generation can be fortified at a great level by means of art and cultural activities at their initial age of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | m.shoorangiz | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | ashik031123 | 92 | view |
| 2020-12-13 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-04 | bibidolce | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | oyondev007 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- Some people believe that technology has made the world a better place while others think it has caused more problems than it has solved Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in school curriculum to what extinct do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n important role to have a good carrier in future. Moreover, the addition of art to the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03385416667 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82148329038 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8699423712 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.388888889 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251322569027 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737371060773 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586667492718 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147212360054 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400524026876 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.