Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
With the development of advanced technology, people have had a higher standard of living but these days, youngsters tend to spend a lot of time using electronic devices, especially smartphones. Several reasons explain this tendency, and I believe that it triggers many adverse effects on their well-being and study.
There are various reasons why it takes children hours to use smartphones. It relates to the development of high technology, which helps children with studying and entertainment. Firstly, smartphones can help children study, for instance, they can search for information and documents, take notes directly on applications such as words, and google docs and they also can learn online through devices. As a result, children do not spend too much money buying notebooks, references, and reaching extra classes. Therefore, they consume various time on mobile phones. Moreover, the smartphone contains many entertaining programs which is a way of relaxing and relieving stress after a hard-working day. The time using smartphones escalates unstoppably without control.
I opine that the excessive use of smartphones exerts many detrimental influences on the young. Kids may suffer from the risk of heart disease and high obesity which are created by a sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical and mental activities when they spend much time in front of the smartphone's screen. In addition, children are easily influenced by toxic activity and brainwashed by misconceptions when using smartphones, especially accessing social media. The time using smartphones escalates unstoppably without parental control.
In conclusion, many factors, including a new emphasis on online learning, the dominance of online interactions, and the lack of parental surveillance, increase the time youngsters use smartphones. I view the trend as deleterious to physical health and study at school for children.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001 61
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- The diagrams below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63763066202 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10211781163 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5317033171 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162411933113 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540798015304 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363537775234 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087097867764 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480409766746 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.