The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given chart demonstrates the amount of four types of meat, namely chicken, beef, lamb, and fish that a person consumed each week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that the consumption of chicken rose sharply while the opposite was true for the intake of beef, lamb and fish over the 25-year period.
In the year of 1979, beef was by far the most popular kind of food, which was close behind at roughly 220 grams per person per week. A similar pattern was seen on the chicken and lamb, capturing around 150 grams whereas fish was the least consumed of four categories, representing approximately 70 grams.
Between 1979 and 2004, these categories went up and down several times. Noticeably, the country witnessed a dramatic increase in the popularity of chicken, which surged quickly to the top spot, around 240 grams. In contrast, the figure for beef and lamb plummeted remarkably over a period that fell into 100 grams and 70 grams per person per week. Additionally, about 40 grams of fish was eaten in 2004, experiencing a slight fall of about 10 grams during the time given.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 84
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
- some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47891462155 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4421591975 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161064144406 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760992475605 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659164655742 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10921284027 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638409008345 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.