Intelligence is the most important quality of leaders. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that intelligence plays the key role when it comes to management. I somewhat disagree with this view as other redeeming features are also of equal importance to leaders.
There are two main reasons why workers with intelligence alone may not be ideal leaders. The first honorable characteristics widely regconized among standout managers is dedication. It is a fact that managerial roles may not devote sufficient time and energy to their organizations if they are not dedicated to their workplaces. The more resources the responsible individuals allocate to their workplace, the more their places of work are likely to be beneficial. Another valuable quality of excellent managers is interpersonal skills, which enables people to communiate effectively to coleagues, surbodinates or senior wokers. The ability not only saves their companies from wasting resources due to misinformation and misunderstanding, but enhances productivity. Thus, apart from smartness, dedication and communicating productively with others are both significants.
Admittedly, gifted leaders with intelligence are undeniably able to make a great contribution to their community. By making appropriate decisions with accurate timing, these workers can help their firms either overcome difficulties or boost profit margins. Intelligence, however, is insufficient for becoming well-rounded leaders; Lacking of dedicating and efficient communication with coworkers, managers may prioritize their personal desire in lieu of mutual interests and be unable to get along with others. This may take its toll on the leaders' perfomance at work.
In sum, I mostly object to the perception that thinking quickly is the most critical value of people who lead others. Both commitment and interpersonal skills act as predecesor to the success of ones as managers, albeit cleverness is x
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many countries spend large amounts of money on preparing competitors in major world sporting events such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup Instead this money can be spent on encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do 84
- out Essay topics Forests are the lungs of the earth Destruction of the world s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nking quickly is the most critical value of people who lead others. Both commitme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77338129496 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3331506687 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672661870504 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5398157501 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933223630075 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314802913381 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371026476499 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636519365433 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302831198081 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.