The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The map illustrates initial and present plan of Grange Park.

Overall, the park has gone through numerous modifications, however, entrance and one particular rose garden of upper left is still unchanged.

In the past, the fountain was located on the center of the park facing entrance on the both sides. On the left of the fountain there was a small circular stage for musicians, which had seats and gardens full of roses on its northern and southern sides, whereas on the right of the fountain there was no any monument or structure. Just on the right of the entrance from Eldon Street was narrower but long glass house spread to the seating area. Likewise, pond and rose garden was on the right of next entrance exactly opposite to the glass house.

At present, the entrance on the both sides remained constant. The fountain is abolished and water feature has been built on the eastern side where glass house and seats were located earlier. The two rose gardens - except the one on the upper left, has been brought together and extended to the center in an exact spot where a fountain once stood. Those gardens are surrounded by the seats on its four sides. Stage has shown colossal improvement and it has been converted to Amphitheatre for concerts. The seats on the northern and seats and garden on the southern part of the stage has been removed. Similarly, Rose Garden and pond besides entrance of Arnold Avenue has been demolished and replaced by café and huge play area for children. Regarding the last change, way to underground car park has been constructed to the right side of water feature and can be accessed through Eldon Street.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-29 nobitaa 67 view
2024-06-07 nobitaa 73 view
2024-06-07 nobitaa 73 view
2023-09-11 chips_0506 89 view
2022-12-11 Saul 73 view
Essays by user Saul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... on the right of the fountain there was no any monument or structure. Just on the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, still, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81052631579 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42248148568 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6503993629 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9285714286 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0673593643106 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297153584775 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405924589177 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647882379 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417753127111 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.