Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Concerning the issue of choosing a suitable studying program, it is believed that more young students should to do vocatinal training rather than study academic subjects in university due to the lack of qualified workers as electricians and plumbers. As far as I am concerned, I do partially agree with this opinion because of some following reasons.
First of all , it can be said with certainty that only vocational training can adapt to the needs of manual work in many developed countries. It is due to the fact that plumbers of electricians play an important role when new constructions are built or there are some problems with the electricity or water supplies of an existing building.
In addition to this, a subsequent factor could be because there is an existing imbalance in the economy of some countries, resulting in graduate unemployment while at the same time there is a lack of skillful manual workers. Because in some countries, too many academic graduates when less students do vocational training, it will put the government under a significant pressure in ensuring that the extra vocational should be taught parallelly with academic study.
In contrast, it is admitted that to meet the demands of professional occupations such as scientists, doctors,…, some talented students should be encouraged to study higher in university instead of doing vocational training. Moreover, if these students success in their fields they studied, they will have a chance to get higher salary and work condition than manual workers.
Taking everything into consideration, people have to weigh up in their thoughts to what extent this issue should be supported. However, the discussion are convincing enough to lead me to the conclusion that people should be careful when choosing the right studying program for them.
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones 61
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f some following reasons. First of all , it can be said with certainty that only...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tries, too many academic graduates when less students do vocational training, it wil...
^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... occupations such as scientists, doctors,…, some talented students should be encou...
^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...vocational training. Moreover, if these students success in their fields they studied, t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23549488055 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95779934779 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3006958202 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.4 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36972808681 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127336580835 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819427105991 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178875320918 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727546206386 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.